Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harrison's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 1938No. Appeal, 64Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Me. Justice Maxey, April 25, 1938:

I think the court below was absolutely right in holding the legacies in question to be demonstrative and I would affirm its decree,

It is elementary in all Anglo-Saxon jurisdictions that “the intention of a testator expressed in his will; or clearly deducible therefrom, must prevail if consistent with the rules of law,” as Chief Justice Fuller said in Y. W. C. H. v. French, 187 U. S. 401. “The cardinal principle of testamentary construction is that the intention of the testator is to prevail, so far as it is disclosed by the language of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Tifft v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  2. Byrne's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Kenaday v. SinnottSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Disston's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Lippincott's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API