Smith v. Marley
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Lee, J.
This is an action to recover a balance upon three title-retaining notes. The pleading on behalf of appellants is entitled “Answer and Cross-complaint. ’ ’ It admits, 'by failing to deny, all of the allegations of the complaint, and the defense is in the nature of a confession and avoidance, under C. S., sec. 6694, which provides that the answer shall contain: “1. A general or specific denial of the material allegations of the complaint controverted by the defendant. 2. A statement of any new matter constituting a defense or counterclaim,” etc.
The answer, in effect, admits the execution of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pocatello Security Trust Co. v. HenryIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Marshall v. GilsterIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Keane v. Pittsburg Lead Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Hopkins v. DipertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
- McDonald v. American Mortgage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Boise City v. Better Homes, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Griffin v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Hendrix v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Hobson v. Security State BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
- Shaw Supply Co., Inc. v. MorganIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.