Legal Opinion

United States v. Adolfo Naranjo

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 26, 2005No. 03-4759PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKEE, Circuit Judge.

Adolfo Naranjo asks us to determine whether the District Court erred in denying his suppression motion based upon the investigating agents’ failure to give Miranda warnings before obtaining an incul-patory custodial statement. He also appeals the District Court’s denial of his request for a minor role reduction in his sentence. For the reasons that follow, we will reverse and remand the case to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I. Factual Background.

In February 2003, Naranjo appeared at the Philadelphia warehouse of Banocol Marketers.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Renchenski v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  3. People v. LopezIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  4. United States v. Johnny Lee Ollie, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  5. State v. O'NEILLSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API