Legal Opinion

Crow v. Batchelor

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1970No. B-1883PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order granting a temporary injunction. The Court of Civil Appeals observed that neither the original appeal bond nor an amended bond filed by appellant complies with the Rules of Civil Procedure. It apparently concluded that the bond is subject to further amendment under the provisions of Rule 430, but the appeal was dismissed because appellant had not given notice of appeal. 451 S.W. 2d 793.

The procedure for taking an appeal from an interlocutory order is prescribed by Rule 385, which does not require notice of appeal. It is for this…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. City of Fort Worth v. First Baptist Church of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Rex Refining Co., Inc. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Beversdorff v. DiengerTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Crow v. BatchelorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Texas Pet Foods, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Clark's Texas, Inc. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API