Legal Opinion

Vermut v. R & M Liquors, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Appellate Division that plaintiff has *830failed to show facts sufficient to require a trial of any issue of fact. He has tendered no evidentiary proof in admissible form adequate for that purpose and demonstrated no acceptable excuse for his failure to do so. To the extent that he now seeks, to reverse the grant of summary judgment against him based on his assertion that the facts of the alleged fraud were exclusively in the possession of the defendant attorney, it suffices to…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. I.K.E. Realty AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Conticommodity Services, Inc. v. HaltmierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API