Legal Opinion

Kali Bari Temple v. Board of Adjustment

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 2, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LANDAU, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs Birenda Nath Ganguly (Ganguly) and the Kali Bari Temple (Temple) appeal from a Law Division judgment affirming the denial of their application for a dual use variance under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70d, a bulk variance under N.J.S.A 40:55D-70e and certain site plan approvals by defendant-respondent Board of Adjustment of Readington Township (Board).

I

Ganguly is a Hindu clergyman. In 1989, he purchased a house on Stanton Road in Readington, located in its RR residential zone. On his attorney’s advice, title to the property was taken in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
Lynch v. DonnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
Braunfeld v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
Medici v. BPR Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Med. Ctr. v. TP. OF PRINCETON ZONING BD. OF ADJ.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
Elco v. RC Maxwell Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996