Legal Opinion

Estate of Hudson v. Tibble

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 16, 2018No. 1-16-2469UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Connors

¶ 1 Plaintiff, the Estate of Scott G. Hudson, by Matthew Caruso, its successor administrator (the Estate), appeals the trial court's orders that granted the motion for summary judgment brought by defendants, Douglas C. Tibble and Brooks, Adams & Tarulis, and denied the Estate's motion to reconsider. Defendants' motion asserted that the Estate could not maintain a cause of action for legal malpractice because defendants were hired by and represented the former administrator of the Estate, and were never the attorney for the successor administrator of the Estate. We find that the trial court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Foutch v. O'BRYANTIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Jackson Jordan, Inc. v. Leydig, Voit & MayerIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Morris v. MargulisIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. The Darren Finding Law Firm, PLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  2. Jordan v. JordanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API