Legal Opinion

United States v. Yee Fing

District Court, D. Montana

Decided April 3, 1915No. 2554PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Yee Fing was convicted of an offense, and he moves for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

This is a motion for a new trial. Defendant was charged with unlawful importation of smoking opium and with having knowingly received the same. The prosecution introduced evidence that November .21, 1914, in Anaconda, defendant, an aged Chinese garden and laundry laborer of many years’ local residence, was taken with 2% pounds of smoking opium in his possession. Defendant testified that, about that time at night in an alley near Chinatown in Butte, upon an unknown white man’s solicitation he purchased the opium, paying therefor $100. Thereupon, upon the prosecution’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Luria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. State v. PotelloUtah Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State v. GrimmettIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Brightman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  5. Gee Woe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API