Legal Opinion

In Re Guardianship of Berry

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided May 8, 2003No. 09-02-291 CVPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Jerry Young and Walter H. Hundley appeal an Order Appointing Permanent Guardian of the Person and Estate of George Andrew Berry, an incapacitated person. The jury found that Berry was incapacitated on November 3, 2000 when he signed a declaration of guardian, found that both Young and Hundley were disqualified to serve as guardian, and failed to find that Ethel WTieat was disqualified to serve as Berry’s guardian. The trial court disregarded that part of the verdict regarding Young and Hundley, and entered judgment appointing Wheat as Berry’s permanent guardian. Four points of error…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Interest of L.C.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Douglas v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

4Cited by28 opinions

  1. In the Guardianship of Erickson, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  2. Adriene Sibley v. Port Freeport, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2024
  3. D. La Belle Beasley v. Leroy Herren, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
  4. G. R. v. Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2020
  5. Harold & Delores Patton v. Loancare, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API