Legal Opinion

Hendrix v. Letourneau

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 10, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Allamakee District Court.— IIoN. A. N. Hob-SON, Judge. Action to recover commission for sale of real property under an agency. The issues raised by general ’and specific denial of the allegations of plaintiff’s petition were submitted to a jury, which returned a verdict for the defendant. Prom judgment on this verdict, plaintiff appeals.—

1Opinion of the Court

McClain, J.—

*452i agency-com-de'fof cSai,i“sn‘ roiAgreement: evidence. *451In the first count of his petition plaintiff alleges a written contract of agency to have been executed between him and the defendant for the sale of defendant’s *452property, and alleges performance of the agreement on his Pai% entitling him to the compensation speci-He<l- In the second count he alleges a verbal agreement to the same effect, with the statement that he seeks to recover on but one count. The evidence tended to show that in a conversation between plaintiff and defendant relating to a contract of agency plaintiff…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. ColemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Pearson v. Milwaukee & St. Paul R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  3. Faunce v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Enix v. Iowa Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  5. Jack v. D. M. & Ft. D. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1878

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wells v. WildinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  2. Davenport Ladder Co. v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  3. Mortenson v. Hawkeye Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API