Scott Edward Knight v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1DissentElder, J.
The majority holds that driving at approximately 42 to 72 miles per hour above the speed limit, in a populated area with numerous cars around is sufficient to support a finding that appellant acted maliciously when he caused the traffic accident that injured four people. The majority further holds that the “ ‘outward manifestation’ ” of appellant’s actions was the intentional and volitional driving of a car at extremely high speeds,” *165which caused the intentional damage to three other vehicles. I believe that appellant’s conduct—although appallingly egregious and reckless—constitutes mere…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Essex v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Haywood v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
- Scott v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Pugh v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
- Robertson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.