Legal Opinion

Coote v. Farnsworth

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Speed, J.) Debt on bond. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendant upon a joint and several bond given to the plaintiff as sheriff of Wayne county.

The bond upon its face purported to be executed by Don M. Dickinson and Levi T. Griffin as principals, and Moses Cohen and the defendant as sureties. It was an indemnity bond, and its condition provided that said Dickinson and Griffin should save and keep the plaintiff harmless and indemnify him against damages and costs that might arise from the levy and sale of property under an execution in his bands upon a judgment in favor of said Dickinson and Griffin, and against one Henry…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. . GurneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Farnsworth v. CootsMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brandt v. VanderveenMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Mason & Hamlin Co. v. GageMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Diamant v. ChestnutMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API