Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Weatherford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 26, 1942No. 8 Div. 47PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The suit of complainants was for the cancellation of a deed from J. W. Haithcock and wife to J. W. McKinney, and sought a sale for division of the lands described in the bill.

Under the last amendment to this pleading, the contention of the complainants was the incapacity of the grantor to make the deed which is of date of October 31, 1934.

There were answer and a cross bill, paragraph four of said cross bill reading as follows : “And alleges that the lands described in paragraph two of this answer as amended was given to this respondent by the said J. W. Haithcock and Frances…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Hackett v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Slaughter v. HeathSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Andrews v. GreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Finney v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Webb v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Griffin v. ArmanaMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Fortune v. BoutwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. Vickers v. PeguesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  5. Fulks v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API