State v. McKinney
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Dissent
hNORRIS, Chief Judge,
dissenting.
For the reasons expressed below, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion and would reverse.
It is well established that an uncoun-seled DWI conviction may not be used to enhance punishment of a subsequent offense, absent a knowing and intelligent waiver of counsel. State v. Deroche, 96-1376 (La.11/8/96), 682 So.2d 1251, 1252 (un-counseled misdemeanor convictions may not serve as the predicate for enhancement of a subsequent DWI offense); State v. Pugh, 588 So.2d 702 (La.1991) (same); State v. Gable, 614 So.2d 808, 809 (La.App. 2d Cir.1993); State v.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Avery v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- State v. LambertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- State v. StrainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Raymond Alton Tucker v. Ed Day, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.