Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Monona County
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Monona District Court. — Hon. F. R. Gaynor, Judge. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the district court affirming an assessment made against it for benefits alleged to have accrued to its road or right of way by the improvement of a drainage district.
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
The plaintiff’s line of railway crosses tbe drainage district and intersects therein twenty-five different forty-acre tracts. The commissioners appointed *173for that purpose assessed the benefit of the drainage system to said railroad at $182.47, distributing the same upon the road in the several forty-acre tracts in sums varying from fifty-five cents to $19.50, according to the classification adopted by said commissioners. At the hearing before the board of supervisors upon the commissioners’ report, the railway company appeared by counsel,, and objected to the assessments made upon its…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ross v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Johnson Drainage District, No. 9 v. Hamilton CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
3Cited by17 opinions
- Stahl v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Lightner v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- In re the Location & Establishment of Drainage District No. 3Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Mittman v. FarmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.