Legal Opinion

Mayo v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 14, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals his conviction for delivery of metamphetamine. He contends that the Trial Court committed legal error in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment against him due to its failure to identify him under his proper name.

An undercover Wilmington police officer purchased a small quantity of methamphetamine from a person who identified himself as “Orwell.” The officer later picked out “Orwell’s” photograph from among several police identification folders of drug suspects known to frequent the area where “Orwell” made his sale. The folder containing his photograph bore the name…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Romans v. State of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  2. Lasby v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
  3. State v. PalmerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
  4. State v. NorrisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
  5. Mumford v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  2. Addison v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
  3. Benson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
  4. Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2022
  5. Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API