Legal Opinion

Kern Valley Bank v. Koehn

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 1912No. Civ. No. 1102PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. Mahon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action to recover upon a promissory note. Judgment went for plaintiff in accordance with the verdict of a jury to which the issues were submitted for trial. Defendant appeals from the judgment and an order of the court denying his motion for a new trial.

The execution of the note was admitted. As an affirmative defense it was alleged the note was made without consideration and that it was given in renewal of a former note made and executed by defendant to plaintiff, which first note at the time of executing the note herein involved had been paid by the transfer to the bank of certain personal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conant v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Netcott v. PorterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Webster v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Winget v. RockwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. Tekai Corp. v. Transamerica Title Ins. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Estate of ButtsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API