Security Loan & Investment Co. v. Etheredge
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before DeVore, J., Summer term, 1917. Action by the Security Loan & Investment Company against J. P. Etheredge. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cite: 79 S. C. 526; 97 S. C. 375; 52 S. C. 224; 70 S. C. 295; 74 S. C. 246; 75 S. C. 261; 80 S. C. 392; Vance on Insurance, sections 72-73, p. 109; Kerr on Insurance, sections 131-132, pp. 293-4.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fraser.
This is an action for $64.50, the premium on a policy of fire insurance. It was a renewal policy. The defendant received the policy, and kept it, but did not pay the premium. The defense was that the policy provided that it should be void if the insured did not comply with the iron safe clause, and did not malee an inventory of the stock of goods insured. The defendant did not have an iron safe, and made no inventory. The case was tried before Judge DeVore and a jury. At trial there was_no dispute about the essential facts. The…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. GraySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. GraySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. GraySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926