Wade v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.
Following a bench trial, factually stipulated for trial purposes (to preclude the State’s witnesses from having to appear), while preserving the due process issues for appellate review, Brittany Wade appeals her conviction of DUI less-safe, 1 contending that her bent of mind or intent is not an element of this crime and that the use of similar transaction evidence to show the same is prejudicial and not needed by the State. While acknowledging, for the purpose of the bench trial, that Georgia appellate cases currently authorize such similar transaction evidence, she…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Cawthon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Farley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Cunningham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mangum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Frost v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Steele v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Janasik v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Newton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.