State v. Oppert
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LETTS, Judge.
The State appeals an order of discharge entered because of the passage of 90 days after a defense granted continuance with no specific waiver of speedy trial. We reverse.
The waters in this area are muddy indeed and we have already partially certified the question now before us to the Supreme Court. See Fluellen v. Butterworth, 372 So.2d 943 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).
With the utmost of respect we would repeat our apprehensions voiced in State v. Reese, 359 So.2d 33 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978) to the effect that the Supreme Court ruling in Negron v. State, 306 So.2d 104 (Fla.1975) is based on an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Negron v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- State v. KurtzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- State v. ReeseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Coppola v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- State v. DudaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Banks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997