Legal Opinion

Hale v. State of Tennessee, ex rel.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided December 10, 2021No. 3:14-cv-02194Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DR. DAN E. HALE, individually, and for ) Cardinal Revocable Trust, DON HALE, ) individually, and as Trustee for the ) HRC MEDICAL DEFINED BENEFIT ) PLAN, ) NO. 3:14-cv-02194 ) JUDGE RICHARDSON Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) STATE OF TENNESSEE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend (Doc. No. 98, “Motion”). The State Defendant responded. (Doc. No. 99). Plaintiff filed no reply. BACKGROUND This action has been pending for more than seven…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hamid v. WaterhouseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Tennessee Walking Horse Breeders' & Exhibitors' Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
  3. Pettrey v. Enterprise Title Agency, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API