Frick v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals. Tlie child was about two years of age at the time of •the injury.
1Opinion of the CourtRay, J.
The accident and injury complained of in this case, is the same as that which constitutes the subject matter of the action in the case of Lulu Frick against the same defendant, (recently decided by this court at.the October term, 1881, and not yet reported).* The only difference between the two cases is, that in the former the little girl, who was injured by the accident in question, sought by her next friend, to recover the damages she had sus*543tamed by reason of the loss of an arm and a leg, the result of said accident; whilst in the present suit the father of that girl is seeking to recover…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mangam v. . Brooklyn R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Koons v. St. Louis & Iron Mountain RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- Boland v. Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
- Drew v. . the Sixth Avenue Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Stillson v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. GrablinNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Rosenkranz v. Lindell Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Herrell v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Winters v. Kansas City Cable Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Oates v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.