Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cole v. Hall

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 27, 1993No. 05-92-01098-CVPublished

1DissentRosenberg, Justice

I respectfully dissent. Cole did not waive the trial court’s error in dismissing her cause of action for tortious interference. The issue should be addressed on the merits, and this Court should hold, consistent with established law, that such a cause of action exists. This Court should also hold that Cole’s pleadings alleged a cause of action for breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing.

1. Tortious Interference with a Statutory Right

The majority holds that the controlling issue in a case where the trial court sustained special exceptions and dismissed the cause of action following…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Aranda v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Murray v. San Jacinto Agency, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API