Legal Opinion

Calk v. Orear

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 23, 1842Published

Assumpsit. Case 134. Error to the Bath Circuit.

1Opinion

Petition foe a re-iiearing,

By Morehead & Reed.

The counsel for the appellant in this case, feel reluctantly compelled to petition the Court for a re-hearing. They do so in a full knowledge of the influences to which their judgments may be liable, from the interest they would naturally feel for the cause of their client; and therefore, keeping that influence in view, they would not have intruded this petition upon the time and attention of the Court, did they not believe, in their deliberate judgments, that the Court had overlooked some features in the cause which, if observed, .might have…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Doniphan v. GillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1841

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API