Legal Opinion

In re Tinney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 5, 1919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Association of the Bar.

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, P. J.:

The respondent in July, 1879, was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law at a General Term of the Supreme Court held in the county of Dutchess and was practicing as such in the First Judicial District at the time he committed the acts complained of. The charge orginally presented was in substance that in an action instituted by Rogers, Peet & Co. against Carpenters’ Trade Journal, Inc., for the recovery of rent due from defendant under a written lease the respondent as attorney for the defendant prepared and caused to be verified and filed an answer which he…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spitzer v. Born, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Spitzer v. Born, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API