Legal Opinion

Ferrill v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1861PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Fayette

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

The appellant was indicted for a misdemeanor. Under the provision of article 541 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, he was tried in his absence from the court. [Paschal’s Dig., Art. 3009, Note 739.] There was a verdict of guilty, and judgment accordingly, and his attorney entered into a recognizance in his behalf to abide the decision of this court upon an appeal here taken.

We decided in the case of Chancy v. The State, 23 Tex., 24, that it is not competent for the attorney of the defendant, or any other person than the defendant himself, to enter into recognizance, as required by article 722…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chaves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API