Legal Opinion

Doe v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 24, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-0366PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge

The plaintiff in these two related cases, Jane Doe 1 , seeks mandamus and declaratory relief against the defendants, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) and the U.S. Department of Education (“DOE”), for alleged violations of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (“Title IX”), 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., Title IV of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title, IV”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000c et seq., the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”), 42 U.S.C. § 18001, et seq., the Administrative Procedure Act…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Z.J. v. Vanderbilt Univ.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
  2. (PC) Porteous v. AvilaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. Aluminum Trailer Company v. Sidi Spaces LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  4. Daughtry v. Kmg Hauling, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2021
  5. Doe v. Syracuse UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API