Young v. Waggoner
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Pulaski Circuit Court; Francis J. Vurpillat, Judge. Action by John C. Waggoner and another against John A. Young. Prom a judgment for plaintiffs, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtIbach, P. J.
— In brief, the essential averments of the amended second paragraph of complaint, on which judgment was rendered, are the following: On April 29, 1908, Samuel A. Eoyer was the owner of a certain described farm of eighty acres in White county, Indiana. On that date, by an agreement in writing, a copy of which is set out, he sold to *204plaintiffs all the timber above a certain size on this farm, and agreed to allow them to erect on the land a sawmill, in order to saw the timber. The consideration for this agreement was $350, then and there paid by plaintiffs. Plaintiffs took possession of the real…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stoner v. ZuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Messick v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Hodgson v. JeffriesIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Brown v. CodyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Industrial Disposal Corp. of America v. City of East Chicago, Department of Water WorksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Baxter v. LyttleIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Gates v. WeyenbergIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Matthews v. TubbsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1928