Legal Opinion

Centeno v. National Default Servicing Corp.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 2013No. 61416Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

preliminary injunction is moot because the foreclosure sale has been completed. See Personhood Nevada v. Bristol,

126 Nev. _

245 P.3d 572, 574

(2010). Concerning appellant's quiet title cause of action, this claim is properly dismissed against these respondents because they no longer have an interest in the property. Therefore, they are not proper defendants in a quiet title action.' See Schwob v. Hemsath, 98 Nev. 293, 294,

646 P.2d 1212, 1212

(1982) (holding that the legal owner of a property was a necessary party to an action adjudicating title to the property). Accordingly, we ORDER the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Personhood Nevada v. BristolNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Rosenstein v. SteeleNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Schwob v. HemsathNevada Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API