Legal Opinion

State v. Kappel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 13, 2003No. 81424; A118678PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C.J.

In this criminal appeal, the state challenges the trial court’s order suppressing evidence obtained after defendant was arrested for driving while under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to suppress on the ground that, although the arresting officer had probable cause to believe that defendant was intoxicated, he lacked probable cause to believe that defendant had driven a vehicle while intoxicated. We agree with the state that the officer who arrested defendant had probable cause to believe that he had committed the crime of DUII. We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HerbertOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. DinsmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. SpruillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. State v. CritesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. State v. BondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. TurleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. StoudamireCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API