Legal Opinion

AccuWeb, Inc. v. Foley & Lardner

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2008No. 2005AP3190PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶ 1. This is a review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals, 1 affirming a summary judgment order of the Circuit Court for Dane County, Judge John C. Albert.

¶ 2. Petitioner, AccuWeb, Inc. (AccuWeb), seeks review of a decision of the court of appeals that affirmed the summary judgment order entered against it in this negligence and legal malpractice action. Respondents are Foley & Lardner (Foley), Harry C. Engstrom (Eng-strom), Quarles & Brady LLP (Quarles), and Nicholas Seay (Seay). This case centers on whether AccuWeb, at the summary judgment stage, put forth sufficient evidence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Lewandowski v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fail-Safe, L.L.C. v. A.O. Smith Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
  2. Midwest Neurosciences Associates, LLC v. Great Lakes Neurosurgical Associates, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Tensfeldt v. HabermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Affeldt v. Green Lake CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Jones v. BaeckerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API