Legal Opinion

Harmon v. United States Shoe Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1999PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on liability based on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur and denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. While browsing through clothing at defendant’s store, plaintiff was injured when the bar on which the clothing hung became dislodged from the wall. Plaintiff met her initial burden by establishing that the event would not ordinarily occur in the absence of someone’s negligence; that the bar was within the exclusive control of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dermatossian v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Smith v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Ciciarelli v. Ames Department Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morejon v. Rais Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Mejia v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Beadleston v. American Tissue Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Garrido v. International Business Machine Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Empire Club, Inc. v. HernandezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API