Legal Opinion

(SS) Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 30, 2025No. 1:21-cv-01177Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JANESSICA PIMENTEL SANCHEZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-01177-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S 13 MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES v. PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DENYING PETITIONER’S REQUEST TO 15 REIMBURSE PARTIAL EAJA FEES Defendant. 16 (ECF Nos. 23, 24) 17 18 Petitioner Laura E. Krank (“Petitioner”), attorney for Janessica Pimentel Sanchez 19 (“Plaintiff”), filed the instant motion for attorney fees on May 14, 2025. (ECF No. 23.) 20 Petitioner requests fees in the amount of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Crawford v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Hearn v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
  4. Parrish v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Rice v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API