Legal Opinion
Zuneska v. Cnty. of Suffolk
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 19, 2018No. 16-CV-0620(JS)(ARL)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SEYBERT, District Judge:
Pending before the Court are defendant the County of Suffolk's (the "County") motion for partial summary judgment and defendant Parents for Megan's Law's1 ("PFML," and together with the County, "Defendants") motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of plaintiff Robert Zuneska's ("Plaintiff") claims. (Cty.'s Mot., Docket Entry 34; PFML's Mot., Docket Entry 35.) For the following reasons, PFML's motion is GRANTED and the County's motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
BACKGROUND 2
I. Factual History
A. SORA and Plaintiff's Sex Offender Status
Under New York…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Falls v. PittDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020