Legal Opinion

Sweins v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 1936No. Civ. No. 10307PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

An alternative writ of prohibition was issued upon the petitioner’s application showing that, in an action foreclosing a chattel mortgage, the respondents made an ex parte order appointing a receiver without requiring the applicants for such order to give an undertaking.

Section 566 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that: “If a receiver is appointed upon an ex parte application, the court, before making the order, must require from the applicant an undertaking ...”

The provisions of that section are mandatory (22 Cal. Jur., p. 468) and the order was therefore void. (Westphal v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Westphal v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Panama Timber Co. v. BarsantiCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API