Diaz v. Diaz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
“ 'In order to modify an existing custody or visitation arrangement, there must be a showing that there has been a change in circumstances such that modification is required to protect the best interests of the child’ ” (Matter of Peralta v Irrizary, 76 AD3d 561, 562 [2010], quoting Matter of Arduino v Ayuso, 70 AD3d 682, 682 [2010]; see Matter of Francois v Grimm, 84 AD3d 1082 [2011]; Matter of Garcia v Fountain, 82 AD3d 979 [2011]). “ ‘Since any custody determination depends to a very great extent upon the hearing court’s assessment of the credibility of the witnesses and of the character,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carl J. B. v. Dorothy T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Kozlowski v. MangialinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Trinagel v. BoyarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Chabotte v. FaellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Caravella v. ToaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of Klein v. TheusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Selliah v. PenamenteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Bacchi v. ClancyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Bacchi v. ClancyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Carleo v. PluchinottaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.