Legal Opinion

Mechanics National Bank v. Buckman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1916No. Appeal, No. 260PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal, No. 260, Jan. T., 1915, by Elwood W. Watson, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Philadelphia Co., Sept. T., 1909, No. 10, for plaintiff, in case of Mechanics’ National Bank of Trenton v. W. A. Buckman and George Buckman. Foreign attachment in assumpsit. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. The court entered judgment for the plaintiff and against the garnishee for $1,571.36. Elwood W. Watson appealed. Error assigned was the judgment of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Elwood W. Watson, who appears in this court as an appellant was no party to the proceeding in the court below, in which the judgment of which he complains was entered against a garnishee summoned by the Mechanics’ National Bank of Trenton, and the motion to quash the appeal must, therefore, prevail.

Appeal quashed.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fish's ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Newberg v. Board of Public EducationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Force's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. In re Consolidated return of Real Estate Tax Sale Held September 10Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Alloy Metal Wire Company, Inc., AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API