Legal Opinion
McElroy v. Continental Casualty Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 24, 2009No. 43,868-CWPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDrew, J.
|,The primary issue in this matter is whether a policy of automobile insurance issued by Continental Casualty Company provided underinsured motorist (“UM”) coverage to Michael McElroy, who was driving a vehicle that was insured under the policy. Finding that the policy did not provide UM coverage, we reverse the judgment denying Continental’s motion for summary judgment.
*379FACTS
Michael McElroy, an employee of Amer-iPride, was severely injured when the Am-eriPride-owned van he was driving was involved in a collision with a truck driven by James Talbert. After settling with Tal-bert’s liability…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Duncan v. USAA Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- NAB Nat. Resources v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- AIU Ins. Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Rashall v. PenningtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
- Landry v. Aetna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hughes v. Zurich American Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Hansen v. River Cities Disposal Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Alexander v. Estate of McNealLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Draayer v. AllenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Andre Alexander v. the Estate of Maurice D. McNealLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.