Legal Opinion
Thorrez & Maes Mfg. Co. v. American Central Ins.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 28, 1939No. 15027PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’BRIEN, District Judge.
The matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s action. The suit is brought to recover One Hundred Thousand ($100,000) Dollars the face amount of a use and occupancy fire *111insurance policy. The policy purports to insure net profits, and charges and expenses prevented from being earned, or necessarily continuing after destruction of the property by fire. It is undisputed that while the policy was in full force and effect a fire occurred causing a loss of use and occupancy of One Hundred…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Heim v. American Alliance Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Brecher Furniture Co. v. Firemen's InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Attorney General ex rel. Michigan Lubricator Co. v. Commissioner of InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Hudson Mfg. Co. v. New York Underwriters' Ins.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Labberton v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Oppenheim's, Inc. v. KavanaghDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1950
- Wiltsie v. Standard Accident InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
- Thorrez & Maes Manufacturing Co. v. American Central InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941