People v. Vredenburg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
It was not error for Criminal Term to deny a motion for mistrial brought by defense counsel after a prosecution witness volunteered that he had been asked to take a polygraph test. The court immediately sustained the objection and issued a prompt curative instruction. This corrected the error and minimized the prejudice which otherwise might have resulted from the unsolicited remark (see, People v Timmons, 95 AD2d 955).
We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either meritless or harmless error in view of the overwhelming evidence of guilt. Mollen, P. J.,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. TimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. MalakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. AdelineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. AversaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. SanseveroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. GladstoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.