Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Flynt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 5, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Wilbarger. Tried below before Hon. A. H. Carrigan.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, Associate Justice.

For the third time this case is before us. On the first appeal -the judgment of the trial court was reversed because the jury were peremptorily instructed to find for appellee Flynt. See 24 Texas Civ. App., 394, 59 S. W. Rep., 1126. On the second appeal the judgment was reversed because of error in the submission of the issues to the jury. See 28 Texas Civ. App., 219, 67 S. W. Rep., 347. The statements of the facts in the reports cited enable us to now refer to them very briefly.

Appellee Flynt claims the 130 acres of land in controversy by virtue of a deed from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People's Building, Loan & Saving Ass'n v. DaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Taylor v. FlintCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  3. Taylor v. FlyntCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kahn v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. First Nat. Bank of Rule v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Garlitz v. International-Great Northern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Dallas Railway & Terminal Company v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API