Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. Susskind

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 14, 1964No. 63-513PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TILLMAN PEARSON, Judge.

The appellant was one of the defendants in an action in the circuit court to collect on three promissory notes totalling $100,000. S.he appeals a summary final judgment against her for $99,900 principal, $4,400 attorney’s fees and costs of $32.00.

Rose Weinstein, the appellant, was one of the endorsers with her husband upon the notes with which we are concerned. A corporation known as Benel, Inc. was the maker of the notes. Rose Weinstein was the owner of one-half of the capital stock in this corporation. Her husband was its president. The remaining stock in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Greeley v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  2. Kovens v. BluestoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  3. Loew v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. Continental Can Co. v. Lee Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1949
  5. Chisholm v. Coconut Grove Exchange BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. WeaverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Suburban Nursing & Mobile Homes, Inc. v. ShawDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API