Legal Opinion
King v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 13, 2017No. 07-589CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Back Pay Act; 5 U.S.C. § 5596; Class Action; FBI Police; 28 U.S.C. § 540C; Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment; RCFC 56
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Senior Judge.
Pending before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) filed by named plaintiffs Jeffrey B. King, Scott A. Austin, Kevin J. Harris, and John J. Hays, on behalf of a certified class of current and former police officers employed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) and defendant the United States (“the government”). The plaintiffs allege that they are owed…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Flying S. Land Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- N.S. v. HughesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020