Legal Opinion

Higginbotham v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 7, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

New trial. Charge of court. Fraud. Practice. Before Judge Maddox. Floyd superior court. September term, 1889. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

In this cage, a deed of conveyance, made by a mother to her son, was attacked as having been procured by the son through fraud committed upon his mother. The’object of the attack was to set aside and cancel the deed. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff. The court, on motion of the defendant, granted a new trial, and the plaintiff excepted.

1. Construing the charge ot the court as a whole, and looking to its general tenor, not scrutinizing it closely to discover inaccuracies, it seems in the main correct; but undoubtedly it contains some inaccuracies which, by…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Higgins v. TrenthamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Livingston v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Holbert v. AllredCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  4. Atlantic & Birmingham Railway Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Davis v. Bell Boy Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API