Legal Opinion

Ratner v. Hogan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 29, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action under G. L. c. 239, § 1, by an alleged landlord, to recover possession of certain premises in Cambridge in the possession of the defendant. The plaintiffs claim title to the premises under a deed dated July 16, 1923, given by Gertrude L. Pyle in her capacity as administratrix of the estate of Reginald T. Pyle, under a license of the Probate Court of the county of Suffolk* dated July 3, 1923. Within twenty days after the entry of the decree of the Probate Court authorizing the sale of the *165premises, on July 21, 1923, one Mary C. Hogan, claiming to be a creditor of the deceased…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stone v. DuffyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Jones v. DonnellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Rogers v. CoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Daley v. FrancisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  5. Marsters v. ClingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rental Property Management Services v. HatcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  2. Cummings v. WajdaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. Realty Developing Co. v. Wakefield Ready-Mixed Concrete Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  4. Nautican Realty Co. v. Nantucket Shipyard, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  5. Swain v. SoglieroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API