Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rushing v. Whitley

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 13, 1995No. 93-KH-2722PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In re Rushing, David; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 109,263; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW-931093.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. Resentencing alone does not restart the three-year time period for applying for post conviction relief. Cf. State ex rel. Campbell v. Whitley, 93-0677 (La. 10/27/95), 661 So.2d 1367 (out-of-time appeal does restart three-year period).

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. Campbell v. WhitleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MeadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. State v. BrumfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
  3. State v. LittletonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. State v. NixonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. State ex rel. Frazier v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API