Legal Opinion
Forrester v. Pullman Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 17, 1941No. 13715PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
A State Board of Tax Appeals, consisting of the comptroller-general, the auditor, and the treasurer, ex officio, was created by section 18 of the act approved January 3, 1938. Georgia L. Ex. Sess. 1937-1938, pp. 77 et seq. Section 19 of that act declares in part that “The function of the Board of Tax Appeals shall be to review the assessments made by the State revenue commissioner when by such assessment, after hearing by the commissioner or his regularly authorized employee or agent, any taxpayer may be aggrieved and petition for said-review.” Code Ann., Cumulative Part, §…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Columbus Mutual Life Insurance v. GullattSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Pullman Co. v. SuttlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Columbus Southern Railway Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Allied Mortgage Companies Inc. v. GilbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. RedwineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Forrester v. Pullman Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Forrester v. Pullman CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. RedwineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- State ex rel. Chilean Nitrate Sales Corp. v. Jones, Circuit Court of the 1st Judicial Circuit of Florida, Escambia County1961