Curran v. Arp
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Max F. Arp, from an order of the ' County Court of Kings- county, entered in the office of the clerk of said county on the 10th day of May,. 1910, granting the .plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the answer of the said defendant as frivolous, ■
1Opinion of the Court
Hirsohbebg, P. J.:. The appellant and Rudolph Arp are sued , jointly as copartners. The existence of the copartnership is alleged in the 3d paragraph of the complaint. The 4th, otli, 6th- and 7th paragraphs of the complaint allege.that the plaintiff was injured by being thrown to the ground and being dragged for a considerable distance- by reason of the negligence of the defendants in the conduct and management of a wagon -which was driven in their business at the time in the borough of Brooklyn. The answer which has been held by the learned County Court to be frivolous denies the existence…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stuber v. . McEnteeNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Young v. CatlettThe Superior Court of New York City · 1857
- Jones v. . LudlumNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- People ex rel. Gunst v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Hoffman v. SusemihlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hespe v. Corning Glass Works, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935
- Bovanzier v. BabcockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Youker v. PostAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914