Legal Opinion

Cobble v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 10, 2005No. 04-1677UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, District Judge.

Appellant Timothy Cobble (“Cobble”) appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Cobble raised three claims in support of his petition: (1) ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to investigate and present alibi witnesses in his defense; (2) ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to call either the doctor who treated the assault victim, or the investigating officer, as a witness and for failure to adequately cross-examine the prosecution’s witnesses; and (3) violation of due process for the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Larry Pat Souter v. Kurt Jones, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cartwright v. PhillipsDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
  2. Colwell v. RogersDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API