Van Natta-Lynds Drug Co. v. Gerson
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Kingman District Court. On the 26th of November, 1889, and long prior to that time, George Gerson and Isaac Levy, partners under the firm-name of George Gerson On December 17, 1889, Joseph Gerson and George W. Eogers took the early morning train at Newton for Kingman, Gerson carrying with him his chattel mortgage, and also the deed to A. Cole, and Eogers carrying with him the two notes, one for $200 and the other for $500, against George Gerson & Co.; the train…
Read the full summary
Error from, Kingman District Court. On the 26th of November, 1889, and long prior to that time, George Gerson and Isaac Levy, partners under the firm-name of George Gerson On December 17, 1889, Joseph Gerson and George W. Eogers took the early morning train at Newton for Kingman, Gerson carrying with him his chattel mortgage, and also the deed to A. Cole, and Eogers carrying with him the two notes, one for $200 and the other for $500, against George Gerson & Co.; the train was a little late, and they arrived in King-man about half-past eleven a. m. Upon arriving at Kingman they separated;…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
Upon the application of the plaintiff for a temporary injunction to restrain the sale and disposition of the stock of goods in controversy during the pendency of the proceedings in error, this court granted a restraining order against the defendants, until it had time to examine the record and affidavits on file. The only question for us now to pass upon is, whether the restraining order heretofore granted shall be set aside, or be continued until the final hearing of the case. On account of the overburdened docket of this court, this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Akin v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Wood v. MillspaughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Spokane v. Amsterdamsch Trustees KantoorWashington Supreme Court · 1897